🔗 Share this article

A Denmark-based man has been found guilty of uploading nude segments from protected movies and TV series on the online site Reddit.

Based on a police report reviewed by media outlets, the unnamed man shared 347 clips of nude content in a Reddit group he managed, which were then watched 4.2 million-plus times.

Danish authorities confirm he has been given a seven-month suspended jail term for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts explain the defendant was prosecuted under a rarely-used clause in Danish intellectual property legislation, with the judge finding that by taking the scenes out of their original context, the man had damaged the artists' "moral rights".

He has additionally been found guilty of sharing more than 25 terabytes of protected digital content.

From March 2022 to May 2023, the man known as "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded adult clips featuring over 100 actresses.

He shared them in the forum he was a administrator of.

Per the Danish copyright protection organization the Rights Alliance, his subreddit had more than 6,000 subscribers and users were encouraged to request excerpts of specific actors.

In 2023, campaigners filed the case to the police on behalf of the affected actors, filmmakers and production companies, which led to the forum being closed down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, among the performers whose nude scenes were shared in the community, told Danish media at the period she believed there was a distinction between being seen unclothed in a film and being shown on Reddit.

The actress said the posts amounted to "exploitation".

'A significant signal'

The man was detained in fall 2024 and admitted culpable to the allegations recently.

In a statement following the ruling, TRA head the organization's leader remarked the outcome sent an "important" signal "indicating violations of artists' rights has consequences".

The verdict is viewed as unprecedented in the country for its use of the "ethical protections" section of the Danish Copyright Act, which specifies an creator's creation cannot be utilized in a manner which infringes upon their reputation.

Intellectual property specialist Dr Alina Trapova told BBC News the legal matter was "unusual" for its focus on the damage to the integrity of an artist, rather than to them financially.

How the ruling could affect nations abroad is uncertain.

But she added there may be "more and more of these actions" in the future with the growth of AI, where "the integrity of an individual's work might be tempered with much more easily".