🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, laying waste to the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach took on the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Conflict Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, with no penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “shall be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

A New Football Order: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to join an organization and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then discard him for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.