🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Movement

In Europe, a increasing number of nations are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation may be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to enact a law lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," said the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. An organization set up by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after viewing dangerous social media material suggests that a strict age ban might not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to design products and services that are safe and suitable for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state level due to country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws requiring adult authorization for minors to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various individuals to copy Australia's example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Beyond the West, further countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations adopt a more cautious position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The agency points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate continues, the policies of Australia and its followers demonstrate that states globally are less and less content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.